comparison figshare versus zenodo

Zenodo

see my posts (tag zenodo)

HTML of figshare

9 fields (input)

HTML

Three levels of services

1. general features for FREE accounts
2. services for publishers
1. figshare Viewer
2. visualize any format of supplemental and digital files within your articles
3. services for institutions
1. Curation workflows
2. manage the curation of files to be made public, control quotas and administer rights

https://figshare.com/features

 additional custom METADATA

Public files hosted on figshare are issued with Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) via DataCite through the California Digital Library. In order to meet with DataCite metadata requirements, figshare requires users to add the following information before making files public and citable: Title, author list (ordered), categories (set ontology), tags (free text) and a description with as much context as needed to interpret the files. Users can also add links to external sources.

Institutional clients can define additional custom metadata when implementing figshare.
https://support.figshare.com/support/solutions/articles/6000079087-metadata-and-dois

Profile: All about your profile page

https://support.figshare.com/support/solutions/articles/6000088096-profile-all-about-your-profile-page

Example of a publisher 

https://plos.figshare.com/

Other programmatic tools (in GitHub)

https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=figshare